When TV Product Placement Goes Too Far

by Brett Borders on October 26, 2009

Californication – a prime-time Showtime TV drama – celebrates the womanizing exploits of a lazy rockstar writer named Hank Moody (played David Duchovny). It has some good moments and sharp, engaging dialogue mixed in with the rough. But it jumped the shark for me personally, when it engaged in ultra-sneaky product placement for a social media site that pushed past all known bounds of advertising.

david1

Chillin’ and shillin’ with a product placement for Guitar Hero

Moody lusts after a hot college student (Eva Amurri) who says she moonlights as a stripper. When he goes to her strip club to find out more, she doesn’t go by her normal name. Her stripper pseudonym, she explains, is “Ashley Madison.”

david25

“Hi! On this show, I’m just a dating site ad disguised as a woman.”

She introduces herself to the other guests by her full pseudonym, and they emphatically repeat her name full name – more than once – to clarify it. Something about they way she emphasized her name seemed unnatural for a TV show. And something about her name faintly ‘rang a bell.’ Sure enough, when I Google’d her name – I found AshleyMadison.com – a dating site for married people looking to have affairs.

Wow! A prime-time TV character who is essentially nothing but sexploitation ad for a shady dating site! I’m used to fake “hotties” from dating sites showing up on Facebook and Craigslist and spamming in my inbox. But this was a whole ‘nother level in stealth, commercialization and subconscious suggestion implanting.

  • Was naming a alluring character after a shady dating site ‘clever marketing’? Hell yes!
  • Was this advertising effective? It worked on me, I Google’d “her” and encountered the product.
  • Does it kill the show’s credibility? Definitely. How can you trust the characters after that?
david3

A more traditional, semi-transparent product placement for Skype

If the content is otherwise credible and top-notch, I can tolerate a smattering of more traditional product placement – like the featuring of a Skype logo through a foggy, translucent window in a scene where characters using Skype’s call-waiting features and audio tones. But I worry a little when I start to think “Ya know, that entire scene and dialogue wasn’t created for artistic or dramatic reasons – it was just filler designed to facilitate the placement of a subliminal advertisement.”

But the very essence of a TV drama is to create lifelike characters that people trust and ‘believe in’ enough to allow them escape from reality for 30 minutes. And when the actors and actresses are pitching products while they’re supposed to be sincerely seducing us into suspension of disbelief – the whole illusion goes up in a flash.

What’s your take on product placement? Have you seen social media sites make paid appearances on other shows?

  Click here to share this post on Twitter!

If you enjoyed this interview, please leave a comment or share it with your followers on Twitter! You can also Subscribe via RSS for more interviews and articles from Social Media Rockstar!

  • DailySpectacle
    Is it possible they were being ironic? Or has this already been confirmed as product placement? I'm just saying a stripper name of 'Ashley Maddison' which happens to be a site of debauchery and sleaziness is actually pretty appropriate, is it possible this was the intention?
  • If that's not product placement, I don't know what is.

    Also this season, the show did product placement for "RedTube" a user-
    generated porn site.
  • DailySpectacle
    I'd have to rewatch the scene to judge for myself. When I saw this scene the first time nothing stood out to me.

    If so then it does go a bit far in advertising a cheating site. However from a show about sexual addiction (and yes, sometimes cheating) should we necessarily expect the highest calibre of advertising ethics?
  • chasflemming
    Reminds me of Lisa Catera, on Chicago Hope. Character's name came from a Cadillac Catera commercial ("Lease a Catera").
  • This
  • Steve
    Great auto-spam there, "ugg boots for sale"... grab an existing comment (mine) and paste it in with a link to your spammy POS website.

    It's too bad that sh!t actually works for SEO unless it gets removed...
  • Great article. Product placement is big business. Indie filmmakers actually look at it as a source of funding their films, but I personally think this may have gone too far.

    Was the name just a coincidence? Doubtful.

    The other thing here is this: "And something about her name faintly ‘rung a bell.’"

    Rang a bell?
  • A lot of times, and sometimes it's really even advertise on shows, like they have to mention the name and so forth which I find funny at times...lol
  • heyya,

    Personally I don't have a problem with product placement, especially if it's done in a subtle or believable way. In fact, when people wonder how advertising will survive on TV, considering all the DVR / Tivo users and downloaders etc, my answer is always 'product placement'.

    Comedies can often get away with not being very subtle - "30 Rock' being a good example of having done product placement tongue in cheek often - but more serious shows have to incorporate it into the episode better.

    In the Californication examples you mentioned - the Skype implementation was great imo. The stripper using 'Ashley Madison" for her name? That could have been an in-character idea as far as we know. I'd heard of that dating site a lot and for a long time (it's been mentioned on Dr Phil's show and tons of other places - usually due to its controversial raison d'etre).

    So I honestly don't know if that was a joke by the character (or writers) or a genuine product placement by/for the dating site. And, since I don't know for sure - if this WAS product placement, then it was a success for me. :-)

    Good post!
  • Steve,

    I guess I'm in the small minority that looks with contempt suspicion
    on undisclosed product placement.

    Especially in a dramatic context. It's one thing if Colbert laughs and
    eats Doritos in a comedy, but if it's done in a drama it kind of
    "kills the fantasy" for me.

    I thought the Guitar Hero and Skype were cool enough products done in
    a believable way - but something about using a hot chick for a shady
    dating site
    crossed the line into "spam" level for me.

    There is no possible way they would have named a girl "Ashley Madison"
    and had here repeat her full name 3 times if there wasn't a large cash
    payment involved.

    Also, I cast a critical eye on the quality of content when I look at
    product placement. If a show is just blazing AWESOMe and consistently
    top notch,
    I'm more likely to tolerate it. I'm not saying this season of
    Californication is completely bunk - but it's had some rather gross
    and lackluster segments.

    If you combine spotty dialogue and "trying too hard" scenes with the
    shadier side of product placement - then the show is no longer "all
    that."

    I'm not the only person to think this the new season.

    This show has some good writers / producers / talent involved - but
    it's far from unstoppable.
blog comments powered by Disqus