<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Online Enemies Are More Powerful Than Friends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends</link>
	<description>Social Media Blog -  .::Social Media Rockstar::.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:58:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis Vuitton</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-41635</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Vuitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-41635</guid>
		<description>I first used the internet in 94, with a $3200 laptop (486dx) my aunt brought home from work. It was boring as living hell and akin to meeting God at the same time. There was no search engine besides Lycos and you rarely came up with results. Most pages had links to other sites, and this is how you navigated, one likeminded site to another. Our 14.4k connection (56k wouldn&#039;t exist for years) cost about $10 an hour, as it was charged by the minute...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first used the internet in 94, with a $3200 laptop (486dx) my aunt brought home from work. It was boring as living hell and akin to meeting God at the same time. There was no search engine besides Lycos and you rarely came up with results. Most pages had links to other sites, and this is how you navigated, one likeminded site to another. Our 14.4k connection (56k wouldn&#39;t exist for years) cost about $10 an hour, as it was charged by the minute&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nbaallstar</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-39910</link>
		<dc:creator>nbaallstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-39910</guid>
		<description>This blog so wonderful,We sell newest &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dunkkick.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cheap nike dunk sb shoes&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dunkkick.com/mens-mid-nike-dunk-sb-shoes-c-300.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheap dunk low Shoes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dunkkick.com/womens-high-nike-dunk-sb-shoes-c-302.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cheap Nike SB High Shoes&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog so wonderful,We sell newest <br /><a href="http://www.dunkkick.com/" rel="nofollow">cheap nike dunk sb shoes</a> <br /><a href="http://www.dunkkick.com/mens-mid-nike-dunk-sb-shoes-c-300.html" rel="nofollow">Cheap dunk low Shoes</a><br /><a href="http://www.dunkkick.com/womens-high-nike-dunk-sb-shoes-c-302.html" rel="nofollow">Cheap Nike SB High Shoes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends can be a wealth of Knowledge! &#171; PR is My Biz</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-38670</link>
		<dc:creator>Friends can be a wealth of Knowledge! &#171; PR is My Biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-38670</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Enemies (Think “Keep your enemies closer to you, than friends) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Reviving This Blog!St. Louis Twitter4 Types of Friends Every Pastor NeedsSt. Louis and Social Media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online Enemies (Think “Keep your enemies closer to you, than friends) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Reviving This Blog!St. Louis Twitter4 Types of Friends Every Pastor NeedsSt. Louis and Social Media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Blog Of Louis Pagan &#187; Social Media Link Haze</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-38665</link>
		<dc:creator>The Blog Of Louis Pagan &#187; Social Media Link Haze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-38665</guid>
		<description>[...] Online Enemies (Think &#8220;Keep your enemies closer to you, than friends) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Online Enemies (Think &#8220;Keep your enemies closer to you, than friends) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-24137</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-24137</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-24416</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-24416</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-26068</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-26068</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-37790</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-37790</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-37874</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-37874</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheamus</title>
		<link>http://socialmediarockstar.com/why-online-enemies-are-more-powerful-than-friends/comment-page-3#comment-37882</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialmediarockstar.com/?p=3228#comment-37882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#039;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#039;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#039;pleasing everybody all of the time&#039; is quite appropriate here - seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#039;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, &lt;a href=&quot;http://Problogger.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Problogger.net&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think it&#039;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been thinking about this myself lately, certainly as my own clout is rising within Twitter (albeit still fairly slight), and I&#39;m starting to pick up a few trolls. I agree with what you&#39;re saying. That said, I also believe that any kind of success inevitably means you are going to attract your share of detractors and naysayers no matter how worthy or respectable you are to everybody else. It just comes with the turf. The old adage about &#39;pleasing everybody all of the time&#39; is quite appropriate here &#8211; seeing this as an attainable goal is folly.</p>
<p>Moreover, I would argue that polarising opinion is often a fairly good sign that you&#39;re doing something right. Indeed, I think success can be achieved by:</p>
<p>1. Being very useful to a large amount of people, but avoiding controversy and therefore having few serious critics (say, <a href="http://Problogger.net" rel="nofollow">Problogger.net</a>)</p>
<p>or</p>
<p>2. Being useful, but outspoken and controversial, and attracting many more rabid fans and detractors as a result (say, TechCrunch)</p>
<p>I think it&#39;s very hard to achieve any kind of success with *just* detractors, although again the observation that these individuals are often just as attentive and dedicated as your biggest fans is worth observing. But nobody can please everybody, and I would suggest that those that think they do need to improve their observational skills a little. <img src='http://socialmediarockstar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
